It’s a
simple formula:
- Step 1: It is arrogant to think that you are right and everyone else is wrong.
- Step 2: Christians think that they are right and everyone else is wrong.
- Step 3: Therefore Christians are arrogant.
What more
is there to say?
In our culture it is okay
to be a Christian, but it is not okay to be a dogmatic Christian. You can
embrace Jesus as long as you don’t hold too closely to his exclusive claims. Unfortunately,
this is not possible. Jesus claimed to be the
Son of God. He claimed to be the way
to God. He claimed to be the light of
the world. It is not possible to embrace Jesus without embracing his
exclusivity. You can’t be a Christian without being a dogmatic Christian.
So then, is
it just a conceded point that the arrogance shoe fits? Do we simply say, “It
may be arrogant, but it’s still right”? Do we say, “It’s not arrogant
because it is right”? Do we say nothing?
I think
that there are a few proper responses to this whole idea that certainty and dogmatism automatically equals
arrogance, but I would like to focus on one:
It is not
arrogant to think that someone else is right.
The first
man chooses car number 4. He says that this car truly is the perfect car
because of its combination of safety, appearance, comfort, and MPG.
The second
man chooses none of the cars. He says, “None of these cars are perfect. None of
these experts have it right. Instead of choosing one of these cars, I would be
better served to take what I see here and make my own perfect car. It would
turn out better than any of these.”
In this scenario,
which of the two men might be accused of being arrogant? Would it be the one
who said to one of the seven groups, “I am convinced that you’re right”? Or
would it be the one who says to all of the seven groups, “None of you is
right”? Surely it would be the second man who would be more likely to be viewed
as arrogant.
A dogmatic
person is someone who looks at the worldviews out there, the explanations for
the world and mankind and God, and says, “I think this one is right.”
A
non-dogmatic person is someone who looks at the worldviews out there and says,
“None of these are right. I can come up with a better one.”
If we are honest then we will see that anti-dogmatism has an arrogance that is far beyond any that can be attributed to those who simply think that someone else is right.
Different take than what I've read on the topic and certainly not where I thought it was going to go - but in a good way. I had to think through it a couple times for the full impact, but I can appreciate the bottom line. It almost seems like it's asking for a follow-up post... :-)
ReplyDeleteWhat about the non-dogmatic person's claims of "I can come up with a better one" where often times the "better one" is a simple rejection of the options without any alternatives?